منابع پایان نامه درمورد of، and، the، University

دانلود پایان نامه

Law”, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2003-2004, Vol. l
16. Covelli, N.,‘Cummulation in Sunset Reviews: Lessons From Two WTO Cases’, International Trade Law and Regulation, 2005, Vol.11(5)
17. Crowley, M. A. “Do Safeguard Tariffs and Antidumping Duties Open or Close Technology Gaps?”, Journal of International Economics, Oxford University Press, 2006, Vol.68(2)
18. Davey William, “Implementation of The Results of WTO Trade Remedy Cases”, Illinois Public Law and Legal Theory Research Papers Series, Research Paper No. 05-20, November 30, 2005
19. Douglas Irwin, “Causing Problems? The WTO Review of Causation and Injury Attribution in US Section 201 Case” NBER Working Paper, Series 9815, at: http://www.nber.org
20. Douglas Irwin, “Causing Problems? The WTO Review of Causation and Injury Attribution in US Section 201 Cases” NBER Working Paper Series,Working Paper 9815, at: http://www.nbr.org/papers/w9815
21. Dukgeun Ahn “Foe or Friend of GATT Article XXIV Diversity in Trade Remedy Rules”, Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, February 2008, Vol.11 (1)
22. Dunoff Jeffrey, “Constitutional Conceits: The WTO’s ‘Constitution’ and the Discipline of International Law”, European Journal of International Law, 2006, Vol.17, No.3
23. Epstein Lee, Landes William, and Posner Richard, “Why (and When) Judges Dissent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysyis”, Journal of Legal Analysis, Spring 2011: Vol.3, No.1
24. Ethier, W. J., ‘Dumping’, Journal of Political Economy, 1982, Vol.90 (3)
25. Finger J. Michael, “Safeguards and Antidumping in Latin American Trade Liberalization: Fighting Fire with Fire”, World Bank Trade and Development Series, 2005
26. Gatdula Atty. Jeremy, Higuit Ever and Madarang Rafael, “Trade Remedies, Competition Policy and Government Procurement”, at http://www.pids.gov.ph
27. Grossman, G. M, ‘Imports as a Cause of Injury: The Case of the U.S. Steel Industry’, Journal of International Economics, Oxford University Press, 1986a, Vol. 20(3-4)
28. Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E., ‘Protection for Sale’, The American Economic Review, Oxford University Press on Behalf of American Law and Economics Association, 1994, Vol. 84(4)
29. Hoekman and Mavaroidis, “Competition Policy and the GATT”, World Economy, 1994, Vol.17
30. Hoekman Bernard and Mavaroidis Petros, “WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency and Surveillance”, The World Economy, April 2000, Vol.23
31. Hoffmeister Frank, “Litigating against the European Union and Its Member States-Who Responds under the ILC’s Draft Articles on International Responsibility of International Organizations?”, The European Journal of International Law, Oxford University Press, December, 2010, Vol. 21 No. 3
32. Horn Henrik, “Remedies in the WTO Dispute Settlement System and Developing Country Interests”, Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University Centre for Economic Policy Research, 2004, at:http://www.worldtradelaw.net/articles/hudecremedies.pdf
33. Hudec R.E., “GATT Dispute Settlement after the Tokyo Round: An Unfinished Business”, International Law Journal, Oxford University Press, 1980, Vol.13
34. Hudec Robert E., “Broadening the Scope of Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement”, at: http://www.worldtradelaw.net/articles/hudecremedies.pdf
35. Jackson J.H., ‘Dispute Settlement in the WTO: Policy and Jurisprudential Considerations’, Research Seminar in International Economics, School of Public Policy, The Universityof Michigan, Discussion Paper No. 419, 1998, at:.
36. Jackson John and Tiago Rafael Juk Benke, “The WTO Cases on US Trade Remedies, Opening a Discussion”, Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, 2003, Vol.6 (1)
37. Jackson John H. and Grane Patricio, “The Saga Continues: an Update Banana Dispute and Its Procedural Offspring”, Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, 2001, Vol.4 (3)
38. John Greenwald, “WTO Dispute Settlement: An Exercise in Trade Legislation?”, Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, March, 2003, Vol.6(1)
39. Julio Lacarte, Muro and Petina Gappah, “Developing Countries and the WTO Legal and Dispute Settlement System: A View from the Bench”, Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, September, 2000, Vol.3 (3)
40. Kotera Akira and Tomofumi Kitamura, “On the Comparison of Safeguard Mechanisms of Free Trade Agreements”, Fellow, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, Series 07-E-17, March 2007
41. Krishna, Raj, “Antidumping in Law and Practice”, at:http://www.Globefield.com/03-IP.pdf,
42. Lacarte Muro, Gappah Julio and Petina, “Developing Countries and the WTO Legal and Dispute Settlement System: A View from the Bench”, Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, 2002, Vol. 3 (3)
43. Lee Yong-Shik, “Establishment of the Discipline on Safeguard? Inherent Problems with the Continuing Application of Article XIX after the Settlement of the Agreement on Safeguard”, Journal of World Trade, ISSN 1011- 6702, 2002, Vol.35 (6)
44. Lee, Yong-shik, “Continuing Controversy on “Unforeseen Development” Reviewer’s Notice” Journal of World Trade, ISSN 1011- 6702, 2003, Vol.37 6)
45. Lee, Yong-Shik, “Destabilization of the Discipline on Safeguards? Inherent Problems with the Continuing Application of Article XIX after the Settlement of the Agreement on Safeguards”, Journal of World Trade, ISSN 1011- 6702, Vol.35(6)
46. “Legal Arguments Concerning Non-Violation Claims”, at:www.WTO.org
47. Lixinski, Lucas, “Treaty Interpretation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Expansionism at the Service of the Unity of International Law”, Europen Journal of International Law, 2010, Vol.21, No.3
48. Longyue Zhao, Yan Wang, “Trade Remedies and Non-Market Economies”, World Bank Institute Poverty Reduction & Economic Management Division, March 2008
49. Moore, M. O. and Suranovic, S. M., “Lobbying Vs. Administered Protection: Endogenous Industry Choice and National Welfare”, Journal of International Economics, Oxford University Press, 1992, Vol.32 (3-4)
50. Olin John M. “The Economics of WTO Rules on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures”, Law and Economics Working Paper No 186, 2003a, at: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/Lawecon/WkngPprs_176-200/186.aos.subsidies.pdf.
51. Pauwelyn, J, “The Puzzle of WTO Safeguards and Regional Trade Agreements”, Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, 2004, Vol.7 (1)
52. Pavoni Riccardo, “Mutual Supportiveness as a Principle of Interpretation and Law-Making: A Watershed for the ‘WTO-and-Competing-Regimes’ Debate?”, European Journal of International Law, Oxford University Press, December, 2010, Vol.21,(3)
53. Pescatore P., “The GATT Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Its Present Situation and Its Prospect”, Journal of World Trade, ISSN 1011- 6702, 1993, Vol. 27(5)
54. Prof. Paul Stevens, “The Fundamental Deficiencies of the Agreement on Safeguards: A Reply to Professor Lee”, Journal of World Trade, ISSN 1011- 6702, 2006a, Vol.40 (5)
55. Prusa and Knetter, “Macroeconomic Factor Impact on Antidumping Filling: Evidence from Countries”, 2000, at: http://www.ssrn.com
56. Prusa Thomas J., “Trade Remedy Provisions in Regional Trade Agreement”, World Trade Organization Economic Research and Statistics Division, Staff Working Paper ERSD-2007
57. Prusa, T., “Why Are So Many Antidumping Petitions Withdrawn?”, Journal of International Economics, Oxford University Press, 1992, Vol.33(1)
58. Ronen Avraham, “Incomplete Contracts with Asymmetric Information: Exclusive Versus Optional Remedies”, American Law and Economics Review, Oxford University Press on Behalf of American Law and Economics Association, 2006, Vol.8(3)
59. Sabry, F., “An Analysis of the Decision to File, the Dumping Estimates, and the O
utcome of Antidumping Petitions”, International Trade Journal, ISSN 1011- 6702, 2000, Vol.14(2)
60. Sagara Nozomi, “Provisions for Trade Remedy Measures (Anti-dumping, Countervailing and Safeguard Measures) in Preferential Trade Agreements”, Fellow, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry, Series 02-E-13, September 2002
61. Shaffer Gregory and Ganin Daniel, “WTO Remedies: Extrapolating Purpose From Practice”, University of Minnesota Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper No.08-51
62. Steinberg Richard H., “In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT-WTO”, International Organization, spring 2002, Vol.56, No.2,
63. Stevenson, C., “Are World Trade Organization Members Correctly Applying World Trade Organization Rules in Safeguard Determinations?”, Journal of World Trade, ISSN 1011- 6702, 2004,Vol.38(2)
64. Sykes Alan, “The Questionable case for Subsidies Regulation: A Comparative Perspective”, Journal of Legal Analysis, Fall 2010: Vol.2, No.2
65. Taylor, C. T., “The Economic Effects of Withdrawn Antidumping Investigations: Is There Evidence of Collusive Settlements?”, Journal of International Economics, Oxford University Press, 2004, Vol.62(2)
66. Teh Robert, Prusa Thomas and Budetta Michele, “Trade Remedy Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements”, World Trade Organization Economic Research and Statistics Division, September 2007, at: www.wto.org
67. Tharakan, P. K. M. “Political Economy and Contingent Protection”, Economic Journal, Oxford University Press, 1995, Vol.105
68. United States Trade Representative, “United States-Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Certain Steel Products”. First Written Submission of the United States of America, October 4, 2002, at http://www.ustr.gov
69. Van Damme Isabelle, “Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body”, European Journal of International Law, Oxford University Press, December, 2010, Vol.21, No.3
70. Why are Safeguards Needed in a Trade Agreement?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper N. 2006-06, at: http://www.ssrn.com
71. World Bank, “Double

مطلب مشابه :  پایان نامه با کلمات کلیدیمدیریت کیفیت، مدیریت کیفیت جامع، کیفیت جامع، بهبود مستمر

Author: yazoa

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید